What we are up to

We are currently developing and supporting dialogue projects on rapidly emerging areas of science and technology, such as autonomous vehicles, the use of data and genomic medicine.

Find out more about these projects below.

  • An imagined future city scape

Future flight technologies

Landmark public dialogue and new funding give the public a real stake in the future development and regulation of emerging aviation technology in the UK. [...]

  • A person wearing a watch holds a pile of wood chips in their hands, with more wood chips scattered on the ground below. They are outdoors, wearing jeans and boots.

Biomass & BECCS public dialogue

In March 2022 the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) and its partners (Sciencewise and UKRI) commissioned a public dialogue to explore public [...]

Sciencewise learning webinar

In April 2022 Sciencewise held a webinar: Public Dialogue and the Policy Cycle - a learning webinar from UKRI's Sciencewise Programme. Attendees were able to [...]

  • Close-up illustration of a DNA double helix structure with sparkling, bead-like textures on a dark blue background, with floating light particles resembling snow or stars.

Telling the story of a genomics dialogue

Author: Simon Wilde, Engagement Director at Genomics England Genomics England’s second foray into Sciencewise-funded public dialogue is now complete.  The result is a fascinating and [...]

  • A view of planet Earth from space, showing swirling white clouds, blue oceans, and brown landmasses, with Africa and part of Europe visible, against a dark black background.

Public Dialogue on Location Data

The Geospatial Commission  have partnered with the Ada Lovelace Institute and Traverse to carry out a Sciencewise-supported public dialogue on the ethics of location [...]

  • A silhouette of a signpost with two arrows stands against a colorful sky at sunset, featuring soft pink, purple, and blue clouds.

2020 Sciencewise Review published

Sciencewise is the UK’s exemplar programme for developing robust, qualitative evidence about the public’s views on policy involving science and technology. That hasn’t changed since [...]